Humans don’t behave like computers. That makes life interesting, but it has a serious downside for economists: It is exceedingly difficult to predict the short-term directions of major markets, even when events seem to be entirely predictable.
Read more
The latest by and about Dr. Robert J. Shiller, Nobel prize winner and author of Irrational Exuberance. Independent and unaffiliated.
Saturday, December 5, 2015
Wednesday, November 18, 2015
Crowdfunding or Crowdphishing?
NEW HAVEN – If one were seeking a perfect
example of why it’s so hard to make financial markets work well, one
would not have to look further than the difficulties and controversies
surrounding crowdfunding in the United States. After deliberating for
more than three years, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
last month issued a final rule
that will allow true crowdfunding; and yet the new regulatory framework
still falls far short of what’s needed to boost crowdfunding worldwide.
Saturday, October 17, 2015
Faith in an Unregulated Free Market? Don’t Fall for It
Perhaps the most widely admired of all the economic theories taught in our universities is the notion that an unregulated competitive economy is optimal for everyone.
Read more
Read more
Thursday, September 17, 2015
Fraud, Fools, and Financial Markets
NEW HAVEN – Adam Smith famously wrote of the “invisible hand,” by which individuals’ pursuit of self-interest in free, competitive markets advances the interest of society as a whole. And Smith was right: Free markets have generated unprecedented prosperity for individuals and societies alike. But, because we can be manipulated or deceived or even just passively tempted, free markets also persuade us to buy things that are good neither for us nor for society.
Read more
Read more
Sunday, August 30, 2015
Coming Soon: New Book by Akerlof and Shiller
Ever since Adam Smith, the central teaching of economics has been that free markets provide us with material well-being, as if by an invisible hand. In Phishing for Phools, Nobel Prize–winning economists George Akerlof and Robert Shiller deliver a fundamental challenge to this insight, arguing that markets harm as well as help us. As long as there is profit to be made, sellers will systematically exploit our psychological weaknesses and our ignorance through manipulation and deception. Rather than being essentially benign and always creating the greater good, markets are inherently filled with tricks and traps and will “phish” us as “phools.”
Phishing for Phools therefore strikes a radically new direction in economics, based on the intuitive idea that markets both give and take away. Akerlof and Shiller bring this idea to life through dozens of stories that show how phishing affects everyone, in almost every walk of life. We spend our money up to the limit, and then worry about how to pay the next month’s bills. The financial system soars, then crashes. We are attracted, more than we know, by advertising. Our political system is distorted by money. We pay too much for gym memberships, cars, houses, and credit cards. Drug companies ingeniously market pharmaceuticals that do us little good, and sometimes are downright dangerous.
Phishing for Phools explores the central role of manipulation and deception in fascinating detail in each of these areas and many more. It thereby explains a paradox: why, at a time when we are better off than ever before in history, all too many of us are leading lives of quiet desperation. At the same time, the book tells stories of individuals who have stood against economic trickery—and how it can be reduced through greater knowledge, reform, and regulation.
Thursday, August 27, 2015
Rising Anxiety That Stocks Are Overpriced
Over the five trading days between Aug. 17 and Aug. 24, the U.S. stock market dropped 10 percent — the official definition of a “correction,” with similar or greater drops in other countries.
Read more
Read more
Labels:
Economic View,
New York Times,
stock markets,
stock prices
Friday, July 24, 2015
The Housing Market Still Isn’t Rational
Home prices have been climbing. They have risen 27 percent nationally since 2012, even more in places like San Francisco. But why worry? If you accept the efficient markets theory — and believe that real estate is an efficient market — then these prices are based on “new information,” even if you don’t know what that information is.
Read more
Read more
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)